Traffic Safety Management

Traffic Safety Work

Road Safety

2020 Safety Management for 1000 Transportation Companies

Target Businesses

- Top 1000 companies with the most frequent traffic accidents and those with weak safety management (1000 companies+α(800 companies)

Selection Criteria

- (Rank 1) ‘Transportation companies with traffic accidents involving death in 2009
- (Rank 2) Transportation companies with traffic accidents involving death for the past three years (‘06～’08)
- (Rank 3) Transportation companies with frequent accidents in 2009 and for the past three years (‘06～’08) with the number of retained vehicles taken into account

Method of Management and thereof

① Classify 1000 transportation service provides based on the level of relative safety evaluated based on such index as the number of deaths and frequency of accidents

Contents
Category	Description	Ratio
Concentration (Year-round Management)	Transportation companies with the lowest level of safety	30%
Check-Up (Regular checkup)	Transportation companies with the intermediate level of safety	30%
Concern (Attention required)	Transportation companies with the relatively high level of safety	40%

② Dedicated personnel and operation on all 1,000 transportation service providers under management (One person dedicated to supervise the safety conditions of 20 transportation companies in each district)

③ Safety Management Activities

Contents
Category	Personnel in charge			Safety Management Methods
Category	Visit	Tele phone	E-mail	Driver training	Analyze operation record	Verify safety regulations	Diagnose Safety (General/ Special)	Check Safety	Follow- up Management
Concentration (Year-round Management)	Once or more a month	Once or more a week	Occasional	◎	◎	◎	△	△	◎
Check-Up (Regular checkup)	Once or more every two months	Once or more every two weeks	Occasional	◎	◎	◎	○	△	◎
Concern (Attention required)	Once or more every three months	Once or more a month	Occasional	○	◎	◎	○	△	◎

* ◎ : Conducted intensively, ○: Conducted based on the request of companies, △ Conducted in collaboration with competent government offices

Special management of the spot where there was a pedestrian death accident (Red Spot 1000)

Selection Criteria

- Select 1000 spots where there was a pedestrian death accident in 2009 (commercial or non-commercial combined) through consultation with local government and local police

- Number of Red Spots in major cities and provinces nationwide

Contents
Cate gory	Total	Seoul	Gyeon ggi	North Gyeon ggi	Busan Gyeong nam	Daegu Gyeong buk	Gwangju Jeonnam	Daejeon Chung nam	In cheon	Ulsan	Jeonbuk	Gang won	Chun gbuk	Jeju
Red Spot	1,000	130	123	62	112	99	84	88	56	50	49	52	50	45

Method of Management

- Manufacture and install pennants intended as a guideline for both pedestrians and drivers

- Establish joint inspection team with public officials of local government, Select spots to be under surveillance

Constant monitoring of spots with safety vulnerability

Propose improvements on spots with safety vulnerability in 2009 to competent government office, Monitor improvements

- Establish monitoring team together with relevant institution in each city and province, Monitor whether any improvement is made in 1,000 spots with safety vulnerability with request for improvement made to the competent government office

- Create database based on the analysis of the number of traffic accidents of commercial transportation companies involving deaths before and after the improvements made on those spots with safety vulnerability

(unit: number,people)

Contents
Cate gory	Total	Seoul	Gyeon ggi	North Gyeonggi	Busan Gyeongnam	Daegu Gyeongbuk	Gwangju Jeonnam	Daejeon Chungnam	Incheon	Ulsan	Jeonbuk	Gangwon	Chun gbuk	Jeju
Red Spot	1,000	102	102	78	83	83	78	78	62	58	78	78	78	42